看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >A Survey on Information-Centric Net... 收藏
A Survey on Information-Centric Networking: Rationales, Designs and Debates

A Survey on Information-Centric Networking: Rationales, Designs and Debates

作     者:JIANG Xiaoke BI Jun NAN Guoshun LI Zhaogeng 

作者机构:Institute for Network Sciences and CyberspaceTsinghua University Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua University Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching TechnologyBUPT 

基  金:supported by the National High-tech R&D Program("863"Program)of China(No.2013AA013505) the National Science Foundation of China(No.61472213) State Scholarship Fund from China Scholarship Council(No.201406210270) 

出 版 物:《China Communications》 (中国通信(英文版))

年 卷 期:2015年第12卷第7期

页      码:1-12页

摘      要:The basic function of the Internet is to delivery data(what) to serve the needs of all applications. IP names the attachment points(where) to facilitate ubiquitous interconnectivity as the current way to deliver data. The fundamental mismatch between data delivery and naming attachment points leads to a lot of challenges, e.g., mapping from data name to IP address, handling dynamics of underlying topology, scaling up the data distribution, and securing communication, etc. Informationcentric networking(ICN) is proposed to shift the focus of communication paradigm from where to what, by making the named data the first-class citizen in the network, The basic consensus of ICN is to name the data independent from its container(space dimension) and session(time dimension), which breaks the limitation of point-to-point IP semantic. It scales up data distribution by utilizing available resources, and facilitates communication to fit diverse connectivity and heterogeneous networks. However, there are only a few consensuses on the detailed design of ICN, and quite a few different ICN architectures are proposed. This paper reveals the rationales of ICN from the perspective of the Internet evolution, surveys different design choices, and discusses on two debatable topics in ICN, i.e.,self-certifying versus hierarchical names, and edge versus pervasive caching. We hope this survey helps clarify some mis-understandings on ICN and achieve more consensuses.

主 题 词:网络调查 设计 原理 数据传输方式 信息 通信安全 ICN 应用程序 

学科分类:0810[工学-土木类] 0808[工学-自动化类] 0809[工学-计算机类] 0839[0839] 08[工学] 081201[081201] 0812[工学-测绘类] 

核心收录:

D O I:10.1109/CC.2015.7188520

馆 藏 号:203142696...

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分