摘要：Going beyond the analytical model of the holistic state in rule of law discussion, we can classify the rule of law into national and local levels based on the stages and increments of its execution. The phenomenon of the local rule of law reflects the stages and incremental progress of building a rule of law China. It has a realistic foundation in society and a profound basis in legal theory. Comprehensively advancing the rule of law in China necessitates giving encouragement and support to construction of the rule of law at the local level. The attempts and experiments of local government enable us to explore and innovate the developmental model of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics. The rule of law at the local level is embodied in three dimensions： ＂text--action---concept.＂ Assessment mechanisms and indicators for the local construction of the rule of law should also be established in accordance with this framework. The building of the rule of law at the local level should be synchronized with assessment of the rule of law. We need to optimize top-level design, conduct evaluations of local legislation, improve local rule of law work performance assessment and use a nile of law index to assess the local rule of law in an overall manner.

摘要：《中国的司法改革》白皮书指出，‘从2004年开始，中国启动了统一规划部署和组织实施的大规模司法改革’，‘中国司法改革走向整体统筹、有序推进的阶段’，‘从2008年开始，中国启动了新一轮司法改革，司法改革进入重点深化、系统推进的新阶段’，‘随着中国经济社会的不断进步与发展，中国司法改革也将进一步深入推进’。十八大报告也继续强调要进一步深化司法体制改革。

摘要：At present, Chinese labor relations operate under a unitary model of legal regulation in which labor law is applied to workers ＂as a whole, with everyone treated equally.＂ This causes a number of problems. In reality, due to constantly changing modes of employment and the flexibility of workers＇ ＂affiliation,＂ forms of employment are highly diverse. In addition to regular employees, there are also ＂quasi-employees＂ （employee-like persons） whose affiliation is quite weak, and other special employees. This necessitates the updating of the legislative thinking behind labor laws, While holding fast to the assumption that workers are a vulnerable group, we should review the differences between different types of employee and draw up the corresponding regulations on the basis of specific situations. Where legislative technique is concerned, we should do away with the traditional one-size- fits-all legislative model in favor of a dedicated model that targets particular types of subject and particular circumstances. We should abandon the traditional old-fashioned model in which ＂all labor law provisions apply＂ or ＂no labor law provisions apply＂ and categorize employees in such a way as to provide special rules for quasi-employees, special employees and employees of special employers. The legal regulation of labor relations should be based on categorization and differential treatment.