摘要：marxism was spread into Vietnam by patriotic intellectuals from the 20s of the 20th century and still exists until today. The presence of marxism in Vietnam through such a long history is enough to prove its importmlce and strong influence in the socio-political life of Vietnam. First of all, marxism is closely related to the movement of national liberation revolutions in Vietnam from the 20s to the mid 70s of the 20th century： marxism, with its outright revolutionary nature, had most adequately and effectively met the urgent needs of national liberation revolutions in Vietnam at that time, and at the same time evoked the fierce belief of patriotic revolutionists in a noble ideal--tJle ideal of communist society, and encouraged them to devote themselves to national liberation revolutions. It can be said that marxism has become the soul of national liberation revolutions in Vietnam; hence, the victory of such revolutions in the mid 70s of the 20th century is also the victory of marxism in an Eastern country that was very obsolete then. Furthermore, marxism is also associated with the reforming of old society and building of new society--the socialist society in Vietnam： after winning national independence and unification for the country in the mid-70s of the 20th century, Vietnamese patriotic revolutionists posed the question of＂What new model of society should be built in Vietnam to match the country＇s history context？＂ This question is not only related to the fate of of everyone, but also related to the fate of Vietnamese people as a whole. marxism had brought to patriotic revolutionists and all Vietnamese people a very clear answer： the socialist society （the first phase of communist society）, where there will no longer be capitalist ownership, no people exploiting people, no rich and poor, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs, all resources are of common ownership, etc Thus, from 1975 to 1986 （the subsidy period in Vietnam）, the Comm

摘要：The studies of British marxism can be divided into two periods: the upsurge period (1980s-1990s) and thedeepening development period (the beginning of 21st century to now). The studies mainly feature expansions ofresearch scopes, disputes in its definition and boundaries, and transformations from case studies to comprehensiveresearch. There are reasons to expect its future prosperity, if research work can fulfill the following three tasks:strengthening basic studies with literature collections and material analyses, changing logical perspectives byadhering to a holistically structured system, and with an orientation to the practical issues in China, conductingBritish marxism studies under the context of the socialism with Chinese characteristics.

摘要：A new, objective reading of Paul Tillich＇s political writings reveals that he was an ideological ally of Russian Communists. In 1933, he was fired by the Nazis from his position of professor of philosophy at the University of Frankfurt because of his Marxist manifestation, Die sozialistische Entscheidung （The Socialist Decision）, which he did not allow to be translated into English during his lifetime. His pro-American, anti-Russian discourse was simply a subterfuge to hide his fundamental loyalty to the international Marxist movement, a subterfuge required in order to protect his career in American universities.

摘要：Marxist discourse is subject to incredulity and negative impact under the deconstructionist dissolution of＂totality＂ and negation of historical ＂recta-narrative＂. But the ideological tension of marxism has constituted the theoretical basis of deconstructionist and postmodernist criticism of Capitalism and its culture. Furthermore, it is the radical hope of postmodernism. Within the scope of＂postmodern politics＂, marxism still boasts critical competence and theoretical reconstruction capabilities under Capitalist global narrative. ＂Deconstructive marxism＂ contains complex ideological contradictions, on which we should conduct in-depth criticism.

摘要：The second Sino-British forum on marxism aesthetics took place on April in University of Manchester with the theme marxism and Humanities. During the conference both Prof. WANG Jie and Dr. YIN Qinghong had a chance to talk with Prof. Kevin Anderson about some issues related to the thought of the manuscripts and Humanities. Prof Anderson introduced the editing work of MEGA and his new book Marx at margin.

摘要：The article delves into the intellectual endeavors and contributions of David Riazanov in the realm of Marxist scholarship,particularly through his pivotal role at the Marx-Engels Institute(MEI)following the 1917 Bolshevik *** an early academic setback,Riazanov’s self-taught expertise in various disciplines laid a solid foundation for his contributions to ***’s tenure at the MEI was marked by significant projects aimed at collecting,editing,and publishing Marx and Engels’works,culminating in the comprehensive compilation *** advocacy for an authentic representation of original texts underscored his scholarly ***’s pre-revolutionary activities and his critical stance on Bolshevik policies highlighted his dedication to a broader socialist *** ideological differences and challenges,Riazanov’s efforts significantly advanced the understanding and dissemination of Marxist thought,underscoring the complex interplay between political activism and academic scholarship in the development of socialist ideology.

摘要：The White Tiger is Aravind Adiga＇s first novel just like Son of the Native Soil which is Shadrach Ambanasom＇s first oeuvre. The two novels address two major social concerns （the caste system and tribal loyalty） that impair national cohesion in India and Cameroon respectively. Briefly speaking, the caste refers to the classification of peoples in India （and other South Asian countries） into in-marrying hereditary social classes of the privileged and the underprivileged while tribal loyalty refers to selfish attachment to a tribe or clan to the detriment of community or national feeling. The two concepts are related in the sense that the word ＂caste＂ derives from the Spanish or Portuguese ＂casta＂ meaning race, lineage, breed or clan. In both cases therefore, the issues of sectionalism, division, discrimination, selfishness, marginalization, and hegemony （amongst others） are at play--issues that impede the notion of nationhood. Read principally from the Marxist perspective of power dynamics and class struggle, the paper argues that Adiga and Ambanasom through skillful manipulation of symbols, time, characters and events, try to imagine the deconstruction of caste and ethnic loyalty in India and Cameroon respectively, which to the two authors, are only historically and socially erected edifices rather than natural order. For the two authors, although global forces may seem to play in favor of a more equitable human society, a necessarily violent revolution might be required to dismantle a blighted body politico-modus operandi that has operated in the people＇s psyche for a long time, as characters and events in the two novels reveal.